Review: 'Dracula' a lavish Pittsburgh Ballet Theatre production
Lavish sets and spectacular production values, including simulated flying, elevate Pittsburgh Ballet Theatre's "Dracula," which was revived this weekend at the Benedum Center Downtown. The ballet is a co-production with Houston Ballet and was first seen in 1997. Choreographer Ben Stevenson's language uses a lot of pantomime in addition to classical ballet moves to develop the characters and advance the action.
We meet Dracula and his 18 blond brides in Act I in the crypt of his gothic castle, but the high point is The Bite he takes out of his new "love," the redheaded Flora. Nurlan Abougaliev took the title role Friday night. Despite the larger-than-life cape, his portrayal was not as mythically fearsome as one might hope. Julia Erickson was Flora, and much more powerful when undead than when alive.
Act II was a delightful exploration of village life, with Alexandra Kochis full of fire and charms by turn as the brunette Svetlana. Christopher Budzynski created many layers of personality as her beau Frederick. Svetlana is abducted by Dracula at the end of the act.
Dracula's bedroom is the scene of his undoing in Act III, where he tries to take Svetlana. Frederick, the innkeeper and a priest arrive to fight off Dracula and Flora and save Svetlana. Dracula's death, not by wooden stake, seems final.
The music of 19th-century Hungarian composer Franz Liszt, arranged by the late John Lanchbery, provided perfectly evocative atmosphere.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.