Share This Page

Priest pleads not guilty to child porn charges

A Catholic priest pleaded not guilty today in federal court to possessing thousands of pornographic images of young boys.

The Rev. Bart Sorensen, 62, formerly of St. John Fisher Church in Churchill, was released on $50,000 unsecured bond, but U.S. Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan ordered him placed on home confinement with electronic monitoring.

Sorensen declined comment after his arraignment. His attorney, Patrick Thomassey, said it was unusual for a child pornography case to get transferred from state to federal court. The cases that usually get transferred are gun- and drug-related, he said.

"I still don't really understand the federal interest in this case," he said.

U.S. Attorney David Hickton said Wednesday, when the federal indictment against Sorensen was unsealed, that protecting children from exploitation, particularly by people in positions of trust, is a priority for his office.

Allegheny County District Attorney's Office detectives arrested Sorensen on Dec. 10, saying a parish employee called a church child abuse hotline after seeing Sorensen view child pornography on his computer. Sorensen, who waived his preliminary hearing before a district judge, is free on $100,000 bond on state charges of possession of child pornography.

The Roman Catholic Diocese of Pittsburgh removed Sorensen from active ministry and placed him on administrative leave on Dec. 9.

Authorities said they found 5,000 pictures on three CDs they took from his church office during an initial search and additional images and videos they found during a second search. The District Attorney's detective's affidavit said several of the images included young boys posing naked or engaged in sexual activity.

The two federal charges against Sorensen are receiving and possessing child pornography.

The U.S. Attorney's Office said it anticipates the state dropping its charges against Sorensen now that he's charged federally. Mike Manko, spokesman for District Attorney Stephen Zappala, declined comment other than to say that those charges are still pending.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.