Shale impact fee near final deal
HARRISBURG — The state House and Senate are near final agreement on Marcellus shale legislation that would establish a county option fee on drillers.
Voting is expected to begin this week.
"We are working diligently to finalize an agreement on Marcellus Shale that balances growth in the Marcellus sector because we want good jobs and capital brought to the region while also providing environmental protections," said House Majority Leader Mike Turzai, R-Bradford Woods. "We want to take it to the members."
House Minority Leader Frank Dermody, D-Oakmont, called it a "near-deal."
"This (shale bill) has been close so many times," he said
"It is a framework. There is no deal till (Monday,)" said Senate GOP counsel Andrew Crompton.
Kevin Harley, spokesman for Gov. Tom Corbett, said the governor is hopeful a final deal is at hand.
"We worked together with Senate and the House in developing language. We're supportive of it, but it is still developing."
Getting shale legislation was Corbett's top priority for the fall session, but an agreement proved elusive. The governor insisted on a county option fee. The House and Senate passed separate bills with key differences last year.
Local zoning was one of the key issues. Apparently the proposal includes language that allows local zoning but penalizes municipalities that goo too far in restricting development. Details were not available.
"That's our understanding," Dermody said, "I'm not sure that it is clear yet."
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.