Share This Page

Woman who protested police beating at PNC Park fined $1,000

A district judge on Tuesday dismissed an aggravated assault charge against a woman who protested a man's violent arrest at PNC Park, but found her guilty of three summary offenses.

Pittsburgh police arrested Amanda Harle, 30, of Mt. Lebanon, whom PNC Park personnel attempted to eject from the April 9 game. Harle loudly questioned police why they hit Scott James Ashley, 41, of Friendship with batons and arrested him after he struck a park employee, according to criminal complaints.

Someone posted video of Ashley's arrest on YouTube, attracting hundreds of thousands of views.

Once she was handcuffed, Harle tried to kick a police officer, according to a complaint against her. At a preliminary hearing in Pittsburgh Municipal Court, District Judge James Hanley Jr. found Harle guilty of summary harassment, defiant trespassing and disorderly conduct, and ordered her to pay $1,038.50.

Harle's employer, KDKA, suspended her because of the arrest, according to her attorney, Robert DelGreco.

"To some extent, she regrets the consequences of her expressions," DelGreco said.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.