Murtha remains in intensive care in Virginia hospital
U.S. Rep. John Murtha remained in intensive care this morning at a Virginia hospital after he suffered complications from recent gallbladder surgery, his office said.
Murtha, 77, was admitted to Virginia Hospital Center in Arlington yesterday. The Johnstown Democrat said last week he underwent laparoscopic surgery to remove his gallbladder after experiencing an infection in December.
A spokesman declined to give further information on Murtha's condition. His wife of nearly 55 years, Joyce, was with him at the hospital.
"I can't help but be worried about him. He is my friend and my mentor," said fellow Democratic Rep. Mike Doyle of Forest Hills. "We need him to get better, and we need him to stay here."
Doyle and Rep. Tim Murphy said Murtha, chairman of the House defense appropriations subcommittee, often is willing to look beyond party affiliation to get work done, especially on veterans and military issues.
"My thoughts are with him and his family," said Murphy, an Upper St. Clair Republican. "I can only look forward and focus on having him back walking the halls of the Capitol."
On Friday, Murtha is set to become the state's longest-serving congressman. He was elected to the House in a special election in 1974.
Most patients experience swelling and tenderness after laparoscopic gallbladder surgery, said Dr. Anthony Ripepi, who has offices in Upper St. Clair and West Mifflin, and conducts about 300 such surgeries a year.
More serious complications can occur if doctors mistakenly nick an organ, such as the intestine, Ripepi said. That can cause an infection in the abdominal cavity, he said.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.