Charleroi man, girlfriend charged after domestic dispute
A Charleroi man and his pregnant girlfriend were arrested Saturday after he allegedly told police he punched her in the mouth because "all she does is smoke crack cocaine."
Richard Lee Jackson, 50, and Tracey Lynne Ward, 42, were charged after police went to their 700 First St. home at 4:41 p.m.
According to an affidavit of probable cause filed by K-9 officer William Gardner, Ward told police that Jackson punched her in the mouth, causing her to bleed.
Jackson told police that Ward, who is seven months pregnant, "smokes crack cocaine constantly, even with her two small children, ages 3 and 5, in her care."
The affidavit states that Jackson told police to open a coffee table in their residence, where police found two burnt pipes, a burnt spoon and other paraphernalia used to smoke rock cocaine.
Police said the children were in the house at the time.
The children's uncle, Howard Jerolaman, picked them up from the scene.
Their father, Allen Hamilton, has custody of the children and Ward has them on the weekends, according to the affidavit, which said Children and Youth Services was notified about the situation.
Jackson was charged with simple assault and taken to Washington County Correctional Facility on a $5,000 percentage bond.
Ward was charged with possession of drug paraphernalia and two counts of endangering the welfare of children and taken to the jail on a $5,000 straight cash bond.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.