Share This Page

Researchers at Penn State 'awaken' dormant bacteria

Beneath two miles of ice in Greenland, a novel species of unusually small yellow-orange bacteria has been lying dormant for 120,000 years.

On Tuesday, Pennsylvania State University researchers announced they "awakened" the bacteria.

"This organism could have some very unique and useful properties, including perhaps biotechnical ones, like novel enzymes for making antibiotics," said co-discoverer Vanya Miteva, a senior research associate at Penn State.

The discovery strengthens scientists' belief that if any life is found on Mars it would be in the red planet's polar ice caps, where NASA's Phoenix spacecraft landed over Memorial Day weekend.

"No one knows if there is life on Mars, but if there were, it would have to survive at very low temperatures," said Jeffrey Lawrence, associate professor of biology at the University of Pittsburgh. "Understanding the extremes of what you find on this planet could help you understand what is possible elsewhere and how to look for it."

The bacteria, reported at the 108th American Society for Microbiology General Meeting in Boston, is called Chryseobacterium greenlandensis, which means yellow bacteria from Greenland. Only about 10 species of bacteria have been found in polar ice and scientifically characterized.

Chryseobacterium greenlandensis is about 20 times smaller than typical bacteria, making it tiny enough to fit in the microscopic cracks in ice where water stays a liquid and small amounts of nutrients are trapped.

"That's how they survive in the ice," said Miteva, who works in the laboratory led by Jean Brenchley, a biochemistry and molecular biology professor at Penn State. "There are tiny liquid veins between the ice crystals. ... They are small, but this bacteria will fit in there. Life needs water. If there is not water, there is no life."

The bacteria was in a column of ice drilled out of a glacier. To revive the oblong bacteria, the scientists slowly melt the ice and then pass it through filters to remove larger bacteria. The ice water was incubated in the cold without oxygen and with little nutrients.

When scientists examined the bacteria with a high-powered microscope, they discovered it dividing and growing.

Brenchley's team analyzed its genetic material and cross-referenced it against known bacteria. Because it had no matches, they knew it was a new species. It is related to bacteria found in fish, marine mud and the roots of some plants.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.