Share This Page

Duquesne University president denies discrimination allegations

The outgoing president of Duquesne University's faculty senate claims apparent "patterns of gender-, racial- and age-related discrimination" exist on campus, an allegation university President Charles J. Dougherty adamantly denies.

"There is no problem with discrimination at Duquesne. The problem may be with a small group of people who think there is," Dougherty said last week during an interview with Tribune-Review reporters and editors.

In early May, outgoing faculty senate President Paula Witt-Enderby, a pharmacology professor, told Dougherty in an e-mail that the senate "heard from an increasing number of faculty members about discrimination."

Witt-Enderby said faculty members indicated they filed or planned to file complaints with the university's Affirmative Action Office and grievance committee, as well as the U.S. Equal Opportunity Employment Commission and Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission.

Witt-Enderby, whose term as senate president ends June 30, did not say in the e-mail how many faculty members approached the senate with complaints. She declined comment Friday.

Dougherty rebutted the allegations in a reply to Witt-Enderby and sent copies of his reply to all Duquesne faculty and staff members with a university e-mail account.

In the e-mail, Dougherty said he suspected the complaints mentioned by Witt-Enderby included ones brought by three unidentified employees of the law school.

Tension has existed between Dougherty and the law faculty, punctuated by his firing of former dean Donald J. Guter in late 2008. "It is fully expected that (the claims) will be proven groundless," Dougherty said.

Dougherty said Affirmative Action Office data showed "no unusual increase" in complaints.

"Our numbers support this," said Judith Griggs, the university's affirmative action officer, in a statement. She said there were eight complaints in 2007, six in 2008, eight in 2009, and nine cases are under investigation this year.

The Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission would not say how many cases it had, if any, involving Duquesne. The EEOC did not return a call seeking comment.

"The facts are that for a complex university, we have very, very few complaints," Dougherty said.

He said the university is committed to equality, citing its faculty minority hiring program; a minority scholarship program that helped increase freshman minority enrollment 53 percent between fall 2007 and fall 2009; and a requirement that all hiring searches include recruitment of underrepresented groups.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.