Share This Page

Revenue growth won't fill shortfall

HARRISBURG -- Kenneth Gailey of Midland doesn't like the idea of raising state taxes or cutting benefits.

The 50-year-old contractor, who spent 16 years as a carpenter for PennDOT, said he believes state government can make a huge dent in an estimated $4 billion deficit by eliminating or cutting high-end salaries for management and making government more efficient.

"Do we need more taxes• Do we need cuts in the few benefits we have• What we need is fewer people on the high end of that pay scale.

"You hate to see anybody going without, but we can't keep gouging people for tax money," said Gailey, a Republican. "In the big picture, we need to look at where our money is going."

Pennsylvania faces a mounting budget deficit despite signs of improvement in the economy and a boost in tax collections for January, said state Rep. Joe Markosek of Monroeville, the ranking Democrat on the House Appropriations Committee.

The state's estimated deficit of $4 billion will require lawmakers and Gov. Tom Corbett to make "substantial cuts" to the $28 billion budget, said Corbett spokesman Kevin Harley. A clearer picture will emerge March 8 when Corbett gives his budget address to the General Assembly.

State revenue collections for January totaled $72.8 million, or 3.4 percent more than anticipated, according to figures Corbett's office released Tuesday. For seven months of the fiscal year that began July 1, revenue was $264 million, or almost 2 percent, more than estimated.

Even if that growth continues, "it won't fill the hole," said House Appropriations Chairman Bill Adolph, R-Delaware County. "I think nationally we're seeing a very slow recovery."

"We're still anticipating cutting several billion dollars," said Rep. Jim Christiana, R-Beaver County, a member of the budget panel.

Patricia Valentine, deputy director for behavioral health services with Allegheny County's Department of Human Services, worries that cutting back could cost more in the long term if people can't get outpatient services or medications they need and end up being hospitalized or jailed.

"It seems as though drug and alcohol, mental health, among other social and human services, tend to get cut during times of fiscal distress," she said, adding the department serves "some of the most vulnerable people in Allegheny County."

"These are people who have limited resources in order to speak up for themselves."

Blair Hyatt, executive director of Pennsylvania Head Start Association, worries the state deficit could result in cutbacks for Head Start, a preschool program for 3-, 4- and 5-year-olds from low-income families. Program directors are preparing in anticipation of less money, he said.

"We're doing our very best to reach out to new senators and representatives to make sure they understand the importance of Head Start or Pre-K programs, not only to families in their districts but to the economy in their districts," Hyatt said.

Jane Miller, director of government and community relations for Mercy Behavioral Health in the North Side, said it's "almost impossible" to plan for potential cuts. Miller said Mercy Behavioral Health has not experienced budget cuts in recent years but has dealt with "a lack of increases, based on the cost of living."

 

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.