Seton Hill receives $1.5 million gift
A recent $1.5 million bequest to Seton Hill University brings the lifetime giving of Lynn P. Farmer to the Greensburg campus to more than $2 million.
The former Cincinnati resident earmarked the bequest for scholarships in memory of his sister, Jean L. Farmer, a 1943 graduate of Seton Hill, and his mother, Irene S. Farmer.
The endowed scholarships will provide assistance to students with demonstrated academic merit and financial need. First preference for the awards will be given to students studying or majoring in music, English, philosophy or the liberal arts.
Bradley J. Ketterer, an accountant, served as executor of Farmer's estate.
"Lynn was very close to his sister and mother, loved music, and was a master of the English language," Ketterer said. "He made gifts, and this bequest to the university as his way of demonstrating his love for his mother and honoring his sister, who was quite the musician."
In 1997, Farmer wrote to the university. What pleased him most about Seton Hill, he said, was its "...obvious determination to retain ethics and basic values in the curriculum while at the same time integrating innovative approaches to education."
"Mr. Farmer was one of our most faithful donors," Seton Hill President JoAnne Boyle said. "His gifts to Seton Hill were magnificent and directly benefited our students. We are grateful that the Farmer family legacy is assured at Seton Hill by this thoughtful bequest that will make a significant difference in the lives of future generations of students for years to come."
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.