Share This Page

Judge: Westmoreland prison did not violate diabetic inmate's rights

While a former inmate may disagree with how the medical staff at the Westmoreland County Prison treated his diabetes, that treatment didn't violate his constitutional rights, a federal judge ruled today.

U.S. District Judge Nora Barry Fischer adopted a report by U.S. Magistrate Judge Cathy Bissoon that while the prison staff took away Aaron Barto's insulin pump, the staff of the prison's medical contractor, NaphCare Inc., regularly monitored his blood sugar and provided him with three to four insulin shots daily.

Barto, 32, of Latrobe claimed in his lawsuit that taking away his insulin pump caused his blood sugar levels to reach dangerously high levels and led to seizures.

He also claimed that the prison guards placed him in a "suicide watch" cell because they thought he was faking the seizures, but Bissoon's report said they put him in an unlocked cell so that the medical staff could constantly monitor him on the camera, and he was free to roam out of the cell.

Bissoon concludes in her report to Fischer that, at most, Barto could claim medical malpractice but not a violation of his constitutional rights.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.