Share This Page

Dawson man accused of reporting false leak

Charges have been filed against a Dawson man accused of falsely reporting a gas leak.

Michael Sanner, 36, of 1791 Banning Road was charged on Sunday with false alarms to a public safety agency and false identification to law enforcement at District Judge Charles Moore's office.

At 12:40 p.m. Saturday, Scottdale police and the fire department responded to a reported gas leak at an Edwin Avenue home. A woman there told police she did not report a gas leak but said her boyfriend, Sanner, had recently came to her residence and attempted to get inside.

She told police that she would not let Sanner in, and he forcibly tried to enter and told her he would call the gas company.

Police then went to the adjoining residence and asked the man inside, Sanner, if there was a gas leak. Sanner first gave police a false identity, then admitted there was no gas leak, according to police.

Sanner told police he made the false report because he believed his girlfriend had another man in the apartment. Because he pays the bills, he reported a leak because he wanted to have the gas turned off, he said.

A preliminary hearing has been scheduled for Wednesday at Moore's office. Bail was set at $10,000.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.