Share This Page

Series a disservice

The Trib's Wounded Warriors series on the U.S. Army's Warrior Transition units (WTUs) -- " Documents show Army's disservice to broken soldiers ," " Transition staff for military wounded poorly trained, stigmatized, fatigued " and "Lieutenant colonel finds success treating 'soldier as a person '" (Feb. 6, 7, 8 and TribLIVE.com) -- grossly misrepresents the Army's commitment and success in caring for wounded, ill and injured warriors.

The stories did a disservice not only to the hardworking and dedicated caregivers who are caring for our soldiers, but also to the thousands who are working to recover and transition to the next phase of their lives.

Not only did the stories offer questionable facts and figures, but much was presented out of context. Reporter Carl Prine's claim that WTUs are a "dumping ground" is offensive and inaccurate. In fact, in a recent inspector general survey of almost 800 WTU soldiers, 91 percent indicated that the WTU is the best place to heal and reintegrate back into the Army or transition to care in the Veterans Administration.

We acknowledge that our Warrior Care and Transition Program has had some growing pains since it was created in 2007. The inspector general recently completed an extensive review that identified a number of recommendations for improvement; many are completed and we are working on the rest. The Army is absolutely committed to providing our warriors the best available care and treatment.

I am sure most, if not all, of our wounded, ill and injured warriors would rather be somewhere else -- such as back in their units, doing their jobs with their buddies. However, we continue to improve how we care for our wounded warriors every day. To not recognize that effort, and the professionals who lead it, does a disservice to every American.

Lt. Gen. Eric B. Schoomaker

The writer is surgeon general of the Army and commanding general of the Army Medical Command.

Editor's Note: Lt. Gen. Eric B. Schoomaker and other Army officials were offered more than a dozen opportunities to comment for the Wounded Warriors series, but declined. Schoomaker walked away when approached directly by a Trib reporter. On Thursday, he and Army officials declined to speak directly with the Trib or to answer submitted written questions. Schoomaker, who was to travel to Afghanistan, indicated through a spokesman that he would speak to the newspaper late this month.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.