Mexico's drug violence: U.S. in the cross hairs
Americans are under attack not in some foreign province but in their very homes and neighborhoods. Brutal drug cartel violence that wracks Mexico is increasingly seeping over the border into U.S. jurisdictions.
In Phoenix, armed extortionists are kidnapping Americans from their homes and cars. In Southern California, citizens have been abducted by armed gangs linked to the Tijuana drug rackets. And in Texas, Gov. Rick Perry is requesting an additional $135 million for border security to stem transnational gangs that threaten communities across the Mexican border.
Authorities say the gangs are ruthless, well-armed and -organized, as evidenced by the chaos that has gripped Mexico since President Felipe Calderon sent in troops to confront that country's powerful cocaine cartels. Mexican soldiers, police, judges, journalists -- the thugs aren't discriminating as to who ends up in the cross hairs.
Says former U.S. drug czar Barry McCaffrey, "Mexico is on the edge of the abyss." In the meantime Americans are being dragged into it.
If the cartels insist on sending the U.S. a "message," it's high time the U.S. sends one of its own: by deploying troops to defend Americans in at-risk communities. What's needed is a force greater than the Mexican gangsters to send them back to their haciendas -- and not necessarily intact.
Yes, the U.S. must address its illegal drug market. Meanwhile American lives are at risk.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.