Share This Page

Tuesday takes

At it again: The same Toledo, Ohio, Block Bugler that once chided Jesse Helms for saying "no" to communism is back with another warped classic. A Bugler editorial calls conservatives critical of President Obama being awarded the Nobel Peace Prize "a motley crew," then equates them with the Taliban. So, does the Democratic National Committee text or Twitter its instructions to publisher John Robinson Block's home or office?

Complex mess: A dubious bond deal inked by the Pittsburgh Water and Sewer Authority has come back to haunt. Part of a complex, $414 million debt swap deal lost credit guarantees. The interest rate has nearly doubled at a cost of $230,000 a week. If the authority can secure new guarantees, the rate will drop. But at least one rating agency already has issued a "negative outlook" on the debt. The lesson here -- simpler is better.

Countdown to closure? : The phrase "belly up" is being whispered about the future of Pittsburgh International Airport. Flight and passenger volume is down and costs and fees are rising dramatically. It's a sad object lesson in the fallacy of the public underwriting of US Airways, for which taxpayers built a new airport more than a decade ago.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.