Share This Page

Tackling injustice

Every American who treasures the right to vote should thank the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights -- and scorn the Democrat-controlled Congress and an Obama Justice Department unworthy of its own name.

The commission has subpoenaed records related to Justice dismissing, despite compelling video evidence, a Philadelphia voter-intimidation case against three New Black Panther Party members. In doing so, it admirably is pursuing the proper course -- which seemingly is the only course likely to get to the bottom of that outrageous decision.

The dismissal begs questions about politics trumping law, yet Congress still has not seen fit to launch its own investigation. And results of a probe by Justice's Office of Professional Responsibility will be just as fraught with conflicts as the investigation that produces them.

The independent fact-finding commission has no such conflicts. It recognizes that the signal the dismissal sent -- Justice will tolerate voter intimidation -- is reprehensible. And anything less than full, timely compliance with its subpoena will only strengthen suspicions about Justice's deplorable handling of this case.

Thank goodness for the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights' exemplary tenacity in pursuit of the truth.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.