Enough is enough: Holder must go
U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder -- who has called into question his own veracity, put politics above the rule of law, sidestepped transparency and imperiled national security -- must go.
He gave conflicting confirmation-hearing testimony about his relationship with fugitive financier Marc Rich, who was pardoned by President Bill Clinton on Mr. Holder's recommendation. His Justice Department won't reveal its rationale for dismissing a New Black Panther Party voter-intimidation case.
He hindered anti-terror operations by appointing a special prosecutor to probe alleged CIA interrogation abuses. He's providing an undeserved soapbox and undeserved rights to enemy combatant Khalid Sheikh Mohammed by ordering a federal-court trial in New York City -- a ruinously expensive security nightmare -- for the 9/11 mastermind.
And his FBI effectively scuttled a valuable intelligence source by reading the Christmas Day airline bomber his Miranda rights -- without consulting intelligence agencies -- after just 50 minutes of interrogation.
Eric Holder's incompetence on issue after issue makes him manifestly unfit for his job -- and a growing liability for America and this administration. The sooner President Obama ousts him, the better.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.