Share This Page

Pennsylvania's tax burden: Slay Leviathan

How can Pennsylvania add jobs and boost its economy• The Tax Foundation says that's elementary -- lift the crushing tax burden on businesses.

The nonpartisan research group's study, billed as a "landmark, apples-to-apples comparison" of state and local taxes, says Pennsylvania's overall tax burden is heaviest among the 50 states on mature businesses, retailers, research-and-development centers and corporate headquarters. Among new businesses, it's the second-highest in the nation.

The consequences for Pennsylvanians are clear from Investor's Business Daily's own analysis: Since the recession's "official" June 2009 end, job growth has averaged 1.14 percent in the five states with the lowest business tax rates but only 0.75 percent in Pennsylvania and the four other states with the highest rates.

Gov. Tom Corbett wants to change that -- by lowering Pennsylvania's 9.99 percent corporate net income tax rate (second-highest in the nation) and by lifting its $2 million cap on net losses carried forward. Pennsylvanians, after all, elected him to do just that.

These new findings send a clear message to legislators in Harrisburg: If Pennsylvania is to thrive, it must slay the Leviathan. It must stop taxing to death one of the commonwealth's greatest resources.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.