The Thursday wrap
A CBS News poll finds that a whopping 80 percent of respondents said they are no better off today compared to when President Obama took office, reports Jim Geraghty of National Review Online. And 37 percent say they're worse off. These troubling findings aren't as easy to spin as, say, the Labor Department's February jobs report. Despite all the whoop-de-do, that assessment still pegs the nation's unemployment rate at an abysmal 8.3 percent, a three-year low, according to BusinessWeek. And that, in itself, is a low-ball figure. ... At a $10,000-per-couple Democrat fundraiser this week in the Georgetown home of Sen. John Kerry, Vice President Joe Biden reportedly couldn't resist putting down so-called out-of-touch Republicans who "don't know what it means to be middle class." After all, donors in attendance reportedly dined on strip steak, not filet mignon. Mr. Biden's understanding of the middle class rivals that of the fella who says he's retaining the veep as his running mate. ... And speaking of Mr. Obama , the commander in chief told a Denver TV station that he's "proud generally" of U.S. forces in Afghanistan. Now there's a stand-up guy. We suppose his supporters, based on the latest polls, are no less proud, generally , of him.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.