Pitt Panthers add 2 football recruits
Pitt accelerated its recruiting efforts for the 2011 class Friday by getting verbal commitments from two heavily recruited football standouts from Ohio and New Jersey.
The Panthers have received seven early commitments - including versatile athlete Bill Belton of Winslow Township (N.J.) and wide receiver Justin Olack of the storied Massillon (Ohio) program.
Olack, a 6-foot-3, 195-pound senior-to-be, helped lead Massillon to the Division I state playoffs. He was the team's second leading pass-catcher with 49 receptions for 763 yards and three touchdowns.
Olack, a former quarterback, is expected to add speed to a Pitt receiving corps that includes All-Big East flanker Jon Baldwin and Mike Shanahan. Olack, who also considered Indiana, Toledo and Ball State, had 17 catches for 229 yards during the Tigers' four-game playoff run.
Olack, recruited by Pitt's defensive coordinator Phil Bennett, covers the 40-yard dash in 4.55 seconds.
Belton, a 5-foot-9, 191-pounder, also had scholarship offers from Cincinnati, Florida, Louisville, Maryland, Oregon, Penn State, Purdue, South Carolina and West Virginia.
He was recruited by secondary coach Jeff Hafley and offensive line coach Tony Wise.
A dual-threat quarterback who passed for 2,200 yards and 14 touchdowns and rushed for 700 yards and 15 touchdowns, Belton projects as a playmaking multi-purpose receiver. Rivals.com ranks him the No. 28 "athlete" among the nation's seniors-to-be.
The Panthers' other Class of 2011 commitments include Hyattsville (Md.) DeMatha tight end Sam Collura, Ramsey (N.J.) Don Bosco Prep quarterback Gary Nova, Central Dauphin offensive lineman Artie Rowell, Dallastown linebacker Ben Kline and Sicklerville (N.J.) Timbercreek linebacker Quinton Alston.
Staff writer Kevin Gorman contributed to this story.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.