Share This Page

Pitt players face mousetraps

• Pitt coach Dave Wannstedt placed mousetraps around the Duratz Athletic Complex this week, as a motivation tool for the Panthers (2-1) to avoid falling into the "trap" of looking past Saturday's visit to Syracuse (1-2) with the ESPN televised Oct. 2 game at No. 12 South Florida (4-0) looming. "You need to get your feet back on the ground and make sure we get the focus back on what we've got to do and not get caught up in records," Wannstedt said. "I tried to educate them on the history of Pitt playing Syracuse; how difficult it is playing them in the Carrier Dome over the years. They recruit the same kids we do, so let's not be fooled about this. We've got to go up there and play a heck of a lot better than we played last week."

• The betting lines have the Panthers a 15 12-point favorite this weekend, despite beating the Orange by an average margin of 10 points in their previous three meetings. Pitt scored a 20-17 victory over Syracuse last season at Heinz Field, and has yet to cover the spread this season. "I don't know anything about that and, hopefully, our players don't," Wannstedt said. "All that I know is, last year I was in the press box, and we were in a two-minute drill, holding onto the seat of our pants trying to win that game. That kind of sums it up."

Digits

4 -- Pitt's road wins -- in 15 games -- in the past three seasons under Wannstedt. That includes a 3-7 road record in the Big East.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.