Pitt dismisses seniors Porter and Duhart
Pitt coach Dave Wannstedt has dismissed two seniors - receiver T.J. Porter and defensive tackle Tommie Duhart - from the football program.
Both players will transfer, according to a statement released by the university's athletic department. A Pitt spokesman said Wannstedt will have no further comment.
Porter, 21, of West Palm Beach, Fla., was suspended indefinitely prior to spring drills following a February arrest for driving under the influence. It was Porter's second DUI in less than a year. He also was arrested in May 2008 and was participating in a court-supervised rehabilitation program.
The 6-foot-1, 195-pound Porter led the Panthers with 37 receptions for 329 yards in 2007 and was third on the team with 25 catches for 357 yards last season. He also averaged 11.5 yards on 16 punt returns.
Duhart, a 6-4, 290-pounder from Belle Glade, Fla., started three games in '07 after transferring from Coffeyville (Kan.) Community College and had 24 tackles, 4.5 tackles for losses, a sack, two forced fumbles - including one that he recovered in the 13-9 victory over West Virginia - and a blocked kick. He played in only seven games this past season, recording three tackles and a blocked kick.
Duhart was one of three players suspended for the remainder of spring drills April 7 for violating team policy. Senior cornerback Aaron Berry and redshirt sophomore center Wayne Jones were the other players suspended.
Duhart missed the first week of spring drills last year to fulfill academic requirements and spent the second half of last season in Wannstedt's doghouse for off-field issues.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.