Fox Chapel star Dieffenbach picks PSU
Miles Dieffenbach still plans on making his father proud — only not at Pitt.
Dieffenbach, a Fox Chapel lineman, made a verbal commitment Tuesday to play football at Penn State.
The junior also had offers from Pitt, Syracuse, Florida State, Minnesota, Northwestern, Virginia, South Florida and Boston College.
His father, George, is the longtime coach of the Pitt women's tennis team, so many believed the 6-foot-5, 285-pound lineman would choose the Panthers.
"My dad's not upset, at all," said Dieffenbach, who's considered the third-best center prospect in the country by Scout.com. "He supported my decision to the fullest.
"It came down to Pitt and Penn State. I kind of knew I was going to commit (to Penn State) when I visited there a week ago. I liked everything I saw. I visited there again (yesterday) and decided to commit."
Dieffenbach, a first-team all-state player last season, said Penn State could play him at offensive guard or center.
"Wherever I can get on the field the fastest," he said.
Fox Chapel athletic director Mike O'Brien said plenty of college coaches have inquired about Dieffenbach, a four-star recruit who has burst onto the scene.
"It's been great for our school and our program," O'Brien said. "It's flattering when you have Florida State, Northwestern, Penn State and Pitt coaches walking in. These are big-time schools coming to Fox Chapel."
Dieffenbach is glad the recruiting process has ended.
"It took a lot of time away from things," he said. "But now, I can focus on my grades and other things."
Dieffenbach is the fourth WPIAL player to commit to Penn State from the class of 2010. The others are Penn-Trafford guard Luke Graham, Sto-Rox quarterback Paul Jones and Canon-McMillan linebacker Mike Hull.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.