Share This Page

Sewickley Academy star chooses Davidson

Sewickley Academy basketball player Tom Droney carved his name among the most prolific scorers in WPIAL championship game history.

But when the 6-foot-6, 196-pound combo guard accepted Davidson's scholarship offer Wednesday, he said the ability to find the open man will mark his college game as much as his point totals.

"I like scoring, but I love getting guys their open shots and getting the assists," said Droney, who scored 40 points last February while leading Sewickley Academy to a 71-57 victory against Serra Catholic in the WPIAL Class A title game

Sewickley Academy coach Win Palmer said Droney has several characteristics -- aside from his 23.7 scoring average -- that make him a unique high school player.

"No. 1 is his court vision," Palmer said. "No. 2, he is a tremendous passer -- both off the dribble and off the catch. No. 3 is his shooting ability. He has improved so much. No. 4 is his work ethic. He wants to be the best, and he is going to work as hard as he needs to -- and then, he is going to work after that.

"He kind of breaks the mold. There are guys in college and the NBA who have those type of (varied) skills, but you don't see that in high school very often."

Droney, who will be a senior this season, has a 3.4 grade-point average and plans to major in business. He said he considered three other finalists -- Harvard, Boston College and Virginia -- but he chose Davidson because of his relationship with coach Bob McKillop.

"He is a tremendous coach and proven winner," Droney said. "It is also a place where I think I can step in and play right away."

Droney, one of the most highly recruited athletes in the WPIAL Class of 2010, plays point guard at Sewickley Academy and for his AAU team. But he said Davidson also will consider him as a shooting guard.

Droney said Pitt, Notre Dame, Duquesne, St. Joseph's, Wake Forest and West Virginia offered scholarships, but the interest from at least one school had waned recently.

"Notre Dame and I parted ways a little bit ago," Droney said.

Droney, who called Pitt coach Jamie Dixon yesterday, said Dixon was "upset" when he told him of his commitment to Davidson.

"He said he really wanted to get back after me," Droney said. "They sent two scouts to watch me play at the Reebok All-American camp (last week) in Philadelphia.

"Pitt is one of my favorites. I love Pitt to death. Coach Dixon is a great guy, but they (are recruiting) a guard in my class."

Isaiah Epps, a 6-2 senior point guard from Plainfield, N.J., has given Pitt a verbal commitment. Droney said Davidson has not received a commitment from any senior guards.

When asked if he would consider other offers before signing day in November, he said his commitment to Davidson is "solid."

Droney, who lives in Green Tree, averaged 21.7 points per game as a sophomore in 2008 and 15 points per game as freshman. He was named to the all-state first team this year after leading Sewickley Academy (23-5) to the PIAA quarterfinals.

Palmer says he's thrilled with Droney's decision -- with the school Droney chose and the timing of the announcement.

"Now, he can concentrate on improving as a student and basketball player," Palmer said. "He can go back to being a normal teenager."

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.