WR Sanders gets another shot with WVU
West Virginia football coach Bill Stewart has given top returning wide receiver Jock Sanders another chance.
Sanders was reinstated to the team and practiced with the Mountaineers on Saturday, six months after his arrest on drunken driving charges in Morgantown, W.Va.
"It's the right thing to do," Stewart said in brief remarks about Sanders after practice. "It needed to be done to get this behind him."
Sanders was the team's leading receiver last season with 53 catches for 462 yards and seven touchdowns. His actions off the field will be monitored closely, and Stewart hasn't decided whether the junior will miss any playing time during the upcoming season.
"He's on a very short leash," Stewart said.
Teammates were glad to see Sanders, who was suspended indefinitely from the team shortly after his arrest. He wasn't made available for comment after yesterday's practice.
"It was a blessing to get him back out there," quarterback Jarrett Brown said.
A criminal complaint in Monongalia County Magistrate Court says Sanders had a blood-alcohol level of 0.125 percent, above the legal limit of 0.08, when he was pulled over Feb. 7.
It was his second brush with the law in a year.
In March 2008, Sanders and three other players pleaded no contest to a battery charge.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.