Pipeline: Ex-Gateway kicker starting as Syracuse freshman
Approximately 400 highlight tapes later, Ryan Lichtenstein landed a walk-on invitation to kick for Syracuse.
Three weeks into the college football season, the true freshman is the starting kicker for the Orange.
"He's just excited about the opportunity," said Terry Smith, who coached Lichtenstein when he was a three-year starter at Gateway high school. "The whole time when he was going through the recruiting process, all he'd say is, 'I want an opportunity. I want a chance to prove myself.' He's living a dream and showing people he deserves to be a Division I kicker."
Lichtenstein is commonly linked to the 2007 WPIAL championship game when he missed an extra point in overtime. Central Catholic scored on the next drive and converted the game-winning extra point.
There's a catch, though -- that missed kick had more to do with the hold than Lichtenstein.
"The truth is the ball came off the tee, and (Lichtenstein) took it for the team knowing that," Smith said. "He never once said a word about it. He's that kind of kid."
Lichtenstein has moved on from that kick and that game thanks to the help he had from his father and Smith in the recruiting process.
Minnesota and Boston College invited Lichtenstein to walk on, but Lichtenstein felt he had the best opportunity at Syracuse.
He was right.
With the departure of Shane Raupers - who Lichtenstein battled during camp - Lichtenstein earned the starting job and a scholarship.
"I'm excited to get the opportunity to play," Lichtenstein told The Syracuse Post-Standard. "It's a great honor to play at Syracuse. To play college football is a dream come true."
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.