Share This Page

Dukes forward Peggau battling knee injury

CULLOWHEE, N.C. — Duquesne redshirt freshman forward Rodrigo Peggau, plagued by knee injuries throughout his career, was held out of the lineup Monday against Binghamton because of soreness in his surgically repaired knee. The 6-foot-8, 235-pound Brazilian native is being counted on for rebounding help, and coach Ron Everhart said with the team down a man following the loss of sophomore swingman Melquan Bolding to a broken wrist, it's important for Peggau to be healthy.

"Rod's been sruggling a little bit with his knee," Everhart said. "Obviously, we want to get him in there in the mix with the other guys, but we'll get it figured out."

Peggau, who played in just four games before being redshirted last season and undergoing surgery, has played only 11 minutes this season and is scoreless with two rebounds.

• After beating Binghamton, 70-52, yesterday, Duquesne will be seeking its third consecutive 4-0 start today against Division II Arkansas-Monticello. The Dukes started 4-0 last season and 6-0 in 2007-08. Duquesne faces host Western Carolina on Wednesday in its final game of the O'Reilly Auto Parts CBE Classic.

• Duquesne won in the state of North Carolina for just the second time in 14 games. Duquesne's previous victory in North Carolina came on its first visit to the state in 1937 — a 53-33 win over North Carolina State.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.