Share This Page

Dukes' Everhart is not content with staus quo

Less than 12 hours after his team's opening-round exit from the Atlantic 10 Conference Tournament, Duquesne men's basketball coach Ron Everhart was back on the recruiting front.

He will need to replace senior guard Jason Duty and might find himself in the market for a few other new faces if any current scholarship players opt to transfer.

Already, Everhart has secured high-scoring guards Mike Talley, from Melvindale (Mich.) Academy for Business and Technology, and T.J. McConnell, from Chartiers Valley High School, the WPIAL's all-time leader in 3-point shots, for next season.

Everhart seeks another post player, perhaps a junior-college transfer, to complement senior-to-be Damian Saunders, a first-team all-conference selection and the A-10's defensive player of the year this season.

Morakinyo Williams, the 7-foot transfer from Kentucky, showed signs of maturing as the season wore on, but he was used sparingly down the stretch and played just 3 minutes on Tuesday.

Following the 83-71 loss at St. Bonaventure (15-15), Everhart essentially told his team he was not satisfied with mediocrity, meaning there could be changes made to the Dukes' roster. Everhart said "no one is untouchable."

Everhart also said the Dukes failed to find a leader to replaced graduated star Aaron Jackson, although point guard Eric Evans became more comfortable in the role as the season wore on.

Duquesne is still holding out hope of playing at least one more game in either the College Basketball Invitational or Collegeinsider.com next week.

"We've had correspondence with both," Duquesne athletics director Greg Amodio said. "Everybody would like to have an opportunity to participate again. Our guys are not ready to end the season yet."

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.