Share This Page

No. 2 Pitt falls to Notre Dame

Pitt had used unselfish play and teamwork during its flawless Big East start.

On Monday night against Notre Dame, the Panthers weren't so patient.

No. 2 Pitt rushed shots on offense and had breakdowns on defense, and the result was a 56-51 loss to No. 15 Notre Dame at Petersen Events Center.

"We were a little selfish," Pitt senior Gilbert Brown said. "We did a lot of things uncharacteristic, and you see the outcome. That's the reason why we lost."

It was a rare home loss for Pitt (19-2, 7-1 Big East), who has dropped three in a row to a Notre Dame team that uses patience to beat the Panthers at their own game. The loss snapped Pitt's 20-game home winning streak and was only Pitt's second loss in its past 53 home games.

"(Notre Dame) deserved to win," Pitt coach Jamie Dixon said. "They made the plays down the stretch. ... At times, we rushed some shots, and it kept us from getting where we wanted to be. Quick shots and turnovers get magnified when it's a low-possession game."

Notre Dame guard Ben Hansbrough scored a game-high 19 points, including eight in the final 4:20, and he added seven assists for the Fighting Irish (17-4, 6-3). Carlton Scott had 16 points and nine rebounds for Notre Dame, which had lost its previous three conference road games -- to Syracuse, St. John's and Marquette -- by an average of 17.3 points.

Pitt finished with a season-low nine assists. Pitt leads the nation in assists at 20.1 per game.

"I don't think we played our game today," Panthers guard Brad Wanamaker said. "As you've seen in games past, we played together and passed the ball around and got everybody shots. I don't think we did that today. We kind of rushed it a little bit."

Notre Dame has the next nine days off, and coach Mike Brey told his team, which has five senior starters, to prepare to give everything.

"I told (Hansbrough), 'Heat the stove up for Monday night because we are burning all night,' " he said.

Pitt, which had won nine in a row, shot 40 percent from the field (18 for 45), matching its worst effort of the season, and 56.3 percent from the free-throw line (9 for 16).

Notre Dame employed the same patient style of play it used to beat Pitt twice last season. The Fighting Irish worked the shot clock running set plays and making the extra pass -- ingredients Pitt had used during its torrid Big East start.

"That's their formula for us," Brown said. "It's worked the past three games. We are usually the team that grinds it out and plays a half-court set."

Notre Dame went on a 15-5 run to turn a 36-31 deficit into a 46-41 lead on Scott's four-point play with 7:12 remaining.

Pitt got to within 46-45, but Hansbrough scored three consecutive baskets, twice driving through the lane for easy layups, to keep the Irish on top.

"We just couldn't contain him off the dribble," Dixon said. "I was surprised by how he was able to beat us. He played well. He hurt us in a lot of ways."

Down, 54-51, with less than a minute to play, Pitt had a chance to cut the deficit. But Wanamaker missed an off-balance, driving layup attempt, and Notre Dame grabbed the rebound with 48 seconds to play. Hansbrough then made another driving layup for a 56-51 lead with 17 seconds left.

Gibbs, who was 4 for 13 from the field, missed a 3-pointer, and Notre Dame held on for its first win at The Pete in six tries.

"We need to get better because of what we did today," Dixon said. "It's one loss. I know a lot will be made of it. We're used to that. We will learn from it, and I think we will be better because of it."

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.