Share This Page

Former Wisconsin running back to play at Pitt

Pitt running back Ray Graham may get a chance to take a breath, after all.

Former Wisconsin running back Zach Brown informed the Pitt coaching staff that he will enroll in classes and join the Panthers football team next season. Because he graduated and has played only three seasons, Brown will be eligible immediately.

With three running backs — Montee Ball, James White and Jeffrey Lewis — ahead of him on the Wisconsin depth chart during the spring, Brown likely improves his chances of earning playing time by transferring to Pitt.

Panthers coach Todd Graham is concerned about the lack of depth at running back where Ray Graham is the only experienced player. Junior walk-on Desmond Brown and freshmen Isaac Bennett, Jeremiah Bryson, Malcolm Crockett and Corey Davis are the most prominent backups behind Graham.

Zach Brown, 5-foot-10, 219 pounds, might help relieve Graham, who rushed for 922 yards and eight touchdowns last season while sharing time with Dion Lewis.

Brown, who earned a history degree at Wisconsin, was an important player for the Badgers as a freshman in 2007. He rushed for 568 yards, fifth-most by a freshman in school history, including 450 yards and four touchdowns while starting the final four games of the season.

But he never achieved those levels in the next two seasons before taking a redshirt last year. He leaves Wisconsin with a total of 1,152 yards rushing and 11 touchdowns and 20 receptions for 105 yards.

Brown, 22, also considered Miami before deciding to transfer to Pitt.

Pitt has added four other transfers this year, including former Michigan safeties Ray Vinopal and Cullen Christian and wide receivers Brendon Felder, formerly of North Carolina, and Josh Brinson, who played at El Camino (Calif.) Community College.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.