Pitt guard Jacobson could miss Notre Dame
Pitt senior left guard Chris Jacobson, who left the Pitt-Iowa game in the fourth quarter, is day-to-day, according to coach Todd Graham. If Jacobson can't play Saturday, sophomore Cory King will make his first career start.
King (6-foot-6, 325 pounds) was part of the training camp audition for a starting job.
"He has got to be ready to go," Graham said. "He worked his tail off all summer long, and we've got a lot of confidence that he can come in and get it done if he needs to."
» Sophomore Devin Street, coming off a career-best seven-reception, 138-yard performance against Iowa, looks to continue a streak of big games by Pitt receivers against Notre Dame. Jon Baldwin totaled 14 receptions for 253 yards and two touchdowns in the past two seasons against the Irish.
"He's a long guy that can run," Notre Dame safety Harrison Smith said of Street. "He's got a lot of talent. He has good hands and he can make a lot of things happen. Last year Baldwin was their big target, and that's kind of what they are looking at from (Street)."
» Pitt has forced only two turnovers — fewest in the Big East — but the Panthers could get some opportunities against the turnover-plagued Fighting Irish.
Notre Dame has turned the ball over 13 times this season, including five apiece in losses to USF and Michigan. Five of those turnovers came inside the opponents' 20-yard line, with four inside the 10. Notre Dame is last in the nation in turnover margin (minus-2.67 per game).
"We're not taking advantage of opportunities," Pitt defensive coordinator Keith Patterson said. "We've got to pick it up."
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.