Share This Page
WVU

Louisville shocks No. 24 West Virginia, 38-35

MORGANTOWN, W.Va. — West Virginia's problems on special teams finally proved to be its downfall.

Louisville's Andrew Johnson returned a blocked field goal for an 82-yard touchdown to spark the Cardinals' upset of No. 24 West Virginia, 38-35, Saturday afternoon at Milan Puskar Stadium.

Down 24-21, West Virginia drove 73 yards to the Louisville 6 before being stopped when a Geno Smith pass to Stedman Bailey fell incomplete in the end zone.

Kicker Tyler Bitancurt lined up for a 23-yard field goal when Louisville's Adrian Bushell came over the right side of the West Virginia line to block the kick. The ball bounced into Johnson's hands, and he took off down the right sideline to the dismay of the 57,287 in attendance, putting the Cardinals up, 31-21.

West Virginia tried to get back in the game on the next drive but turned the ball over. Smith dropped back to set up a screen as Louisville's Calvin Pryor pressured the junior. The ball slipped out of Smith's hands as he wound up to thrown, and Pryor recovered.

The Mountaineers held Louisville to a three-and-out, but Chris Philpott's punt planted West Virginia at its own 4.

Smith responded, engineering an eight-play, 96-yard touchdown drive to pull the game within three. Shawne Alston capped the drive with a 7-yard touchdown, running over his own offensive lineman, Tyler Rader, in the process.

On the next drive, Louisville faced a fourth-and-one on the West Virginia 43. Dominique Brown appeared to be stopped short but spun off a defender for two yards and a fresh set of downs.

Brown then added a 3-yard touchdown to cap the drive, putting the Cardinals up 10 with 1:50 left in the fourth quarter. The drive covered 66 yards and took 7:03 off the clock.

After West Virginia scored once more on a 65-yard drive in 59 seconds to pull within three once more, Brown recovered the onside kick to seal the win.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.