Share This Page

In Orange Bowl, there's a focus on offenses

MORGANTOWN, W.Va. — A lot of things could happen in the Orange Bowl matchup between West Virginia and Clemson, but Tigers coach Dabo Swinney has a feeling about what fans won't see.

"I don't think it will be a 6-3 ballgame like maybe some of the other games around us," he said. " This should be an exciting game between these two teams."

No. 23 West Virginia (9-3) and No. 14 Clemson (10-3) feature high-powered offenses that should score points in bunches on Jan. 4.

"You don't know, especially when you have a month off," Swinney said. "Defenses can be ahead, especially early in the game. I'd be surprised if there's not going to be some points scored."

Clemson, under first-year offensive coordinator Chad Morris, has scored 33.6 points and gained 440.6 yards per game. The Tigers set school records for passing yards, total yards and points in a season.

Under first-year head coach Dana Holgorsen, the Mountaineers ranked 19th nationally in points per game (34.9), and tied for 17th in total offense (459.6) and seventh in passing (341.8). West Virginia has topped 400 yards nine times and scored more than 30 points in eight of its 12 games. Its 419 points is fourth-most in school history.

"I like the idea of the shootout," said West Virginia receiver Stedman Bailey, who has 1,197 receiving yards and 11 touchdowns this season. "I would love for it to be a great game where it comes down to the end, being a BCS game and that's what the fans want to see."

Quarterback has been the key for both offenses.

Clemson's Tajh Boyd, who originally committed to West Virginia before choosing the Tigers, had a breakout season. The redshirt sophomore threw for 3,578 yards and 31 touchdowns. He had more than 340 passing yards four times this season and added five rushing touchdowns.

West Virginia's Geno Smith turned in impressive numbers, as well. The junior quarterback completed 314 of 483 passes for 3,978 yards — setting season records in both categories — and 25 touchdowns.

Still, with the long layoff, it might take some time for the offenses to get rolling.

"I think both offenses are capable of scoring points," Holgorsen said. "Whether that happens or not, no one knows."

West Virginia and Clemson actually struggled down the stretch. The Mountaineers averaged only 25 points in its last three games, all wins.

Clemson could only mustered 18.5 points per game in its final four regular-season contests but regained its rhythm in the ACC Championship Game in a 38-10 win over Virginia Tech.

"We have been a part of a lot of 23-22 games this year," Holgorsen said. "Defensively, it looks to me that Clemson is as good as anyone we have faced this year."

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.