Share This Page

Pens waste opportunity in loss to Islanders

UNIONDALE, N.Y. -- Losses this late in a season always hurt.

The New York Islanders' 4-1 victory Monday at Nassau Coliseum rendered the Penguins more deflated than any first-place team should feel.

Then again, how many division-leading clubs blow an opportunity like the one the Penguins wasted and don't ultimately regret it?

"I'm really, really disappointed," coach Michel Therrien said after his team failed to clinch a playoff spot. "I'm speechless about their effort and speechless about their concentration and their will to win this game.

"It's unacceptable. Excuses are for losers."

The Penguins, 43-26-7 with 93 points, have no time to sulk. Another Atlantic Division showdown against New Jersey will provide a chance to shake off what was a thoroughly discouraging series of events last night.

Their loss to the bleary, battered and basement-dwelling Islanders meant more than just a missed shot to secure a playoff berth.

The Penguins also did not take advantage of an opportunity to move four points ahead of the Devils, who will control their own destiny within the division if victorious in regulation tonight.

Additionally, the Penguins lost ground to Montreal in the chase for home-ice advantage through the Eastern Conference portion of the upcoming Stanley Cup playoffs. The Canadiens held off Ottawa, 7-5, last night to move three points ahead of the Penguins, who have played one fewer game.

"It was a huge game," left wing Jarkko Ruutu said after his three-contest goal streak ended against the Islanders. "And we weren't very good. That's probably the best way to describe it."

The Islanders entered yesterday with no playoff hopes, last in the Atlantic, coming off a 4-1 loss in Philadelphia on Sunday and without starting goaltender Rick DiPietro and several other regulars due to an injury dilemma that trumped the one facing the Penguins.

No matter, they reminded the Penguins that every game among a season-ending stretch against division foes will require maximum effort and well-rounded execution.

"They outworked us, and we can't let that happen," defenseman Hal Gill said. "We were right with them in the second period, but then we kind of waited around. We have to be sharper and get it done right away rather than just wait around."

New York right wing Richard Park set the tone with a shorthanded goal - a slap-shot past goaltender Ty Conklin at 3:22 of the first period - to put the Islanders ahead, 1-0.

It was the second consecutive game in which the Penguins have surrendered a shorthanded tally. They are among the league leaders in that category at 10.

Right wing Petr Sykora pulled the Penguins even, 1-1, just 36 seconds after Park's goal. Sykora tallied his 28th at 3:58.

The final 40 minutes belonged to the Islanders, however.

New York captain Bill Guerin scored his 23rd and assisted on left wing Sean Bergenheim's 10th, a power-play tally, in the second period. Right wing Trent Hunter erased any doubt of the outcome with his 12th goal in the third period.

"We were kind of OK in the first period, but after that ... work ethic was not there," Therrien said. "It's pretty simple. That's why they won."

New York goaltender Wade Dubielewicz, playing because DiPietro is out for the season with a hip injury, stopped 28 of 29 shots.

Conklin, starting for only the fifth time in 12 games, turned aside 32 shots. He is 1-4-0 with a .877 save percentage since making a career-best 50 saves in a win against the Islanders here Feb. 26.

He was 17-4-5 with a .931 save percentage after that game.

"Certainly I don't think I've played my best the past two or three weeks," Conklin said. "I'm not going to make excuses. The job is the same whether you play every day or every second and third day."

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.