Share This Page

Penguins still dealing with bad Mellon ice

Poor ice conditions at Mellon Arena have been a point of contention all season for the Penguins, and it hasn't improved in the postseason.

"In the morning there was no crowd and there was no heat and it was pretty bad," Penguins forward Maxime Talbot said. "Both teams have to play on it, and it's not an advantage for either team."

In the regular season the Penguins finished 26-10-5 for the best home record in the Eastern Conference.

Pens scratch four

The Penguins scratched defenseman Darryl Sydor, center Jeff Taffe, center Adam Hall and right wing Kris Beech.

Murray doesn't back down

Ottawa coach Bryan Murray didn't back down from his assertion that the Penguins deliberately tanked their season finale in Philadelphia so they could play Ottawa in the first round. But he certainly added a comedic twist when asked about in on Wednesday prior to Game 1.

"I guess I just had a bad TV," Murray said. "It probably was that."

Bettman in attendance

NHL commissioner Gary Bettman was in attendance at Mellon Arena and sat in the stands before heading to the owner's box to visit with Mario Lemieux in the second period. He also addressed the media between the first and second periods.

Outdoor viewing

For fans who want to feel the playoff atmosphere but don't have tickets to the game, there is a 12-by-16 television outside of Gate 3 at Mellon Arena that will carry the FSN Pittsburgh broadcast of Games 1 and 2.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.