Share This Page

Rangers awarded more power plays

The Rangers were awarded three power plays in the first period and six overall Sunday. New York played on the man-advantage only three times in Game 1.

• After failing to score on seven shots in Game 2, Penguins right wing Marian Hossa owns a 5.7 shooting percentage in the playoffs. Hossa's regular-season percentage was 11.0 percent.


He said it

"We were talking on the bench about what a good job he's done. He's actually played really well. Remember, he's going up against he best player in the league right now."

-- Penguins defenseman Brooks Orpik, on Rangers rookie defenseman Marc Staal, whom center Evgeni Malkin beat to set up Jordan Staal's winning power-play goal in Game 2.


Watch these guys

Defenseman Rob Scuderi, Penguins

Don't look now, but Scuderi has recorded three playoff assists. He had only five during the regular season. A stay-at-home defenseman of sure form, Scuderi said the Penguins wanted to prove themselves this postseason as more than an offensive juggernaut. They have allowed only nine goals in six games.

Center Martin Straka, Rangers

A former Penguins' player, Straka has registered only three shots despite playing more than 40 combined minutes in two games against his longtime employer. He was in the penalty box for the Penguins' winning power-play goal late in Game 1. "You make your breaks," Rangers coach Tom Renney said after Game 2 in reference to Straka.


Three stars

1ST STAR: Marc-Andre Fleury, G, Penguins. He responded to allowing four goals in Game 1 - his highest total since Nov. 17, 2007 - by recording his second home shutout of the playoffs.

2ND STAR: Henrik Lundqvist, G, Rangers. Had Fleury not proven perfect in Game 1, three-time Vezina finalist Lundqvist might have stolen home-ice advantage for the Rangers. He stopped 30-of-31 shots.

3RD STAR: Jordan Staal, C, Penguins. He continues to put a disappointing sophomore regular season behind him. His second goal of the playoffs proved to be the winner.


Series glance

1 PENGUINS 5, RANGERS 4

Penguins lead series, 1-0

At Mellon Arena: Overcoming a 3-0 playoff deficit for the first time since Game 1 of 1992 Stanley Cup final, the Penguins benefited from a late power-play chance. Captain Sidney Crosby's point shot bounced off center Evgeni Malkin for the winning goal with 2:41 remaining.

2 PENGUINS 2, RANGERS 0

Penguins lead series, 2-0

At Mellon Arena: Goaltender Marc-Andre Fleury recorded his second shutout in four home playoff games, stopping 26 shots. The Penguins killed each of the Rangers' six power plays, including two over the final 6:04.

3 PENGUINS AT RANGERS

7 p.m. · Tuesday · Madison Square Garden * FSN

The Penguins went 0-3-1 at "the world's most famous arena" during the regular season. Their power-play attack, 2-for-10 this series, was 1-for-16 at Madison Square Garden, where the Penguins have failed to score on the advantage over the past three games.

4 PENGUINS AT RANGERS

7 p.m. · Thursday · Madison Square Garden * Versus

*5 RANGERS AT PENGUINS

2 p.m. · Sunday · Mellon Arena * WPXI-11

*6 PENGUINS AT RANGERS

7 p.m. · May 5 · Madison Square Garden * FSN

*7 RANGERS AT PENGUINS

7 p.m. · May 7 · Mellon Arena * FSN

*If necessary

Additional Information:

Gigapan Interactives

Click here to launch.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.