Share This Page

Insider: Lundqvist's promise

Burning question: How reliable are sports guarantees?

Breakdown: Not very, though New York has a pretty good history with them, particularly in Super Bowls. Joe Namath (Jets) and Plaxico Burress (Giants) both made good on promises of victory. Next up is Rangers goalie Joe Willie Lundqvist (known to friends and loved ones as Henrik), who has guaranteed a victory in Game 3. The Penguins' most famous guarantee was Kevin Stevens telling everyone within earshot that his team would come back and beat the Boston Bruins after dropping the first two games of a playoff series in 1991. That is precisely what the Penguins did.

PuckSpeak: "We know we can put more pressure on them. We're going to do that in New York, and we're going to get the win." -- Lundqvist, as quoted in the New York Daily News, after Game 2.

Looking ahead: If the Rangers are to get back in the series with a win tonight, they'll need Lundqvist to play the way he did in Game 2, when he stopped 30 of 31 Penguins' shots. The Rangers also will need to put more pressure on Penguins goaltender Marc-Andre Fleury, likely in the form of throwing pucks at the net and getting plenty of bodies around him.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.