Talbot, Scuderi uncertain for Game 4; Rangers' Avery to miss remainder of series
NEW YORK -- Lower-body injuries could force the Penguins to play Game 4 of their Eastern Conference semifinal series against the New York Rangers without top penalty-killers Max Talbot and Rob Scuderi.
Talbot, a valued and versatile forward, and Scuderi, one of the club's most sturdy defensemen, were injured Tuesday after blocking shots during the Penguins' 5-3 victory in Game 3 at Madison Square Garden. Neither player participated in an optional practice today.
"It's a foot injury. It's day-to-day, and we'll see," Talbot said. "I'll do everything I can to play, but I don't know."
Talbot missed 19 games in the regular season due to a high right ankle sprain, but said his latest injury was not related. Scuderi missed 11 regular-season games due to a fractured finger.
The Penguins can advance to the East final with a win at the Garden on Thursday. They are 7-0 in the 2008 Stanley Cup playoffs -- the first team to accomplish that feat since the Rangers during their 1994 Cup run.
New York will play the remainder of the playoffs without controversial forward Sean Avery, who has been hospitalized with a lacerated spleen. He was injured during Game 3. Avery is in stable condition at St. Vincent's Medical Center, a hospital spokesperson said.
Avery was injured after being hit during Game 3, a Rangers spokesperson said. He is expected to make a full recovery.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.