Forbes rates Pens18th most valuable NHL team
PHOENIX -- The Penguins are wildly popular, but they are not the Toronto Maple Leafs.
According to Forbes, the Maple Leafs rate as the league's most valuable organization for a third consecutive year. Toronto is worth $448 million, a 9 percent spike from last season.
The Penguins rated 18th in the rankings, which Forbes released Wednesday. Their estimated worth is $195 million, but their 26 percent increase in value is better than any team in Forbes' top 10.
The Penguins kept with their previous stance and did not comment on the Forbes franchise value rankings.
Forbes also reported an $87 million value in revenue and an operating income at $5.1 million for the Penguins, who likely will move into the top 10 after Pittsburgh's new multipurpose arena opens for the 2010-11 season.
Mellon Arena is the NHL's oldest building. Of Forbes' top 10 teams, only the New York Rangers and Detroit Red Wings play in buildings not constructed within the past 15 years.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.