Share This Page

Arena's price tag jumps by $31 million

Rising steel, insurance and construction costs threatened to push the price tag on Pittsburgh's new multipurpose arena even higher than the $321 million that Penguins officials announced Thursday.

"We worked like heck to make sure this was the right building, one we're going to be proud of it, and to make sure we didn't spend a nickel more than we had to," said team President Ken Sawyer.

The Uptown arena will cost $31 million more to build than the original projection of $290 million.

The Penguins will pay $15.5 million of the increase, the state $10 million, and the city-county Sports & Exhibition Authority about $5.5 million, under a deal the SEA's five-member board unanimously approved yesterday.

"It's a very small number on a big project," Sawyer said. "Clearly, there was inflation; steel prices were going up constantly, as were all other material costs, so that was a factor, and the site was a little more complicated."

If the price rises again, the team will cover the overrun under terms of its 2007 agreement with the SEA. The authority is building and will own the arena when it opens in summer 2010.

State Sen. Sean Logan, D-Monroeville, an SEA board member, said he anticipated the increase because the cost was based on 2005 construction prices.

"This locks in the price now, and we're going to have a first-class facility ... that keeps the Penguins here indefinitely," Logan said.

The yet-to-be-named arena will replace 47-year-old Mellon Arena, the oldest venue in the National Hockey League.

Much of the funding is coming from taxes on gambling: Pittsburgh's North Shore casino will contribute $7.5 million a year for 30 years.

The state will match that amount. The Penguins will pay $4.2 million a year for 30 years, in addition to the $15.5 million the team committed to arena's higher cost.

The financially strapped SEA will tap three sources to pay its $5.5 million share, due in 2010, said Executive Director Mary Conturo:

• A ticket surcharge fund, or any amount higher than $2 million a year it generates. The fund produced about $2.7 million last year, when the Penguins made it to the Stanley Cup final.

"The Penguins are telling me I should be comfortable that we can count on two years of playoffs, but we realize this money isn't guaranteed," Conturo said.

• Savings the authority can squeeze from building a parking garage near the arena.

• Possible loans from the city's Urban Redevelopment Authority and the Redevelopment Authority of Allegheny County. The loans would be repaid with money from selling about 650,000 square feet of land under and around Mellon Arena, which will be demolished.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.