Pens have killer instinct on the road
RALEIGH, N.C. — A team that twice has lost at home with a chance to clinch a series in the Stanley Cup playoffs probably has no reason to boast about its so-called killer instinct. However, the Penguins have shown exactly that over the past two postseasons.
"Kick 'em when they're down — it's a big thing," center Jordan Staal said Saturday morning prior to Game 3 of the best-of-seven Eastern Conference final, which the Penguins led, 2-0.
The start to this series mirrored four previous ones since last postseason for the Penguins, who are 10-0 at Mellon Arena in Games 1 and 2. They have won each of those four previous series — in no small part because they returned home with a 3-1 lead in three. Only a four-game sweep of Ottawa in the opening round last year proved the exception.
"In this dressing room we know when there are big opportunities," Staal said. "I'm not sure why that is, but we do have players that know how to finish the job.
"It's more or less (us) just knowing when that opportunity comes to bury (an opponent). There are times in games - and sometimes when you look back those are the times in the series — where you know there is a turning point and you know you can really hurt their hope and take them down."
Prior to last night, the Penguins had gone 5-1 on the road over the past two postseasons with a chance to win the third game of a series.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.