Pens' Stevens loves seeing Crosby near net
DETROIT — If anybody is going to break his franchise single-season record of 17 playoff goals, former Penguins winger Kevin Stevens can think of nobody better than current team captain Sidney Crosby.
"Especially with the way he's been scoring these goals; most of them are with him in the paint, and that's something I can appreciate," Stevens said Sunday before Game 2 of the Stanley Cup Final between the Penguins and Detroit Red Wings.
Now a scout with the Penguins, Stevens scored 17 goals for the 1991 Cup-winning club. Crosby was within three of tying that mark before last night.
Going to the crease, let alone beating goaltenders from around it, is not as easy as Crosby and Red Wings winger Johan Franzen, who had 11 goals before last night, have made it appear in the playoffs.
Stevens, of course, made millions and won the admiration of blue-collar Pittsburgh fans for his ability to score so-called "dirty goals" in the early 1990s. A punishing forward at 6-foot-3, 230 pounds in his prime, Stevens scored at least 40 goals in four consecutive seasons from 1990-94 during his first run with the Penguins.
"I always thought the thing about scoring where (Crosby's) scoring from, it's all about body positioning and being hungry to get that puck in the net," Stevens said of Crosby, who stands 5-11 and weights 200 pounds.
"You see Sid whacking and hacking away at loose pucks. He's doing everything he can to get that puck across the goal line. That's battling. That's paying the price, because getting into those spots on the ice will leave you beat up, but it's worth it to get a goal. I love watching Sid, because he gets that."
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.