PLAYOFF INSIDER: Final no retreat for Pens' Crosby, Red Wings' Hossa
The Stanley Cup Final has proven no vacation for Penguins center Sidney Crosby and Red Wings winger Marian Hossa, two former teammates who coincidentally stayed at the same resort in the Bahamas last summer only days before Hossa signed with Detroit.
Crosby, a playoff MVP favorite entering the Final, has scored only one goal and recorded just three points in this series. Hossa hasn't scored and has recorded just three assists.
As linemates last season, Crosby and Hossa combined for five goals and 13 points in a six-game Final loss to the Red Wings.
Red Wings coach Mike Babcock said Wednesday that Hossa is not "pressing" against the Penguins. However, Babcock acknowledged that Hossa "hasn't been very good" at Mellon Arena.
Fortunately for Babcock and Hossa, a deciding Game 7 on Friday is at Joe Louis Arena - where Crosby has failed to post a point in five of six career playoff contests, including three in this Final.
Crosby remains the playoff leader with 15 goals, but he has not recorded a point in the past two games. He has never gone three games in one postseason without a point.
Penguins coach Dan Bylsma said he is not dissatisfied with Crosby's Final performance.
"He's not just out there to put his name on the score sheet," he said. "He's played the game the right way. He's paid attention to details."
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.