Martin says Devils' record against Pens a coincidence
• The Penguins were unable to claim the Atlantic Division last year almost exclusively because they couldn't beat the New Jersey Devils. A source from the other side of last season's trouble with New Jersey says the Penguins shouldn't be concerned. Paul Martin, who signed a contract with the Penguins this summer after spending his entire career in Newark, said the Devils' 6-0 record was "coincidence" more than anything. He did acknowledge, however, that by the end of the regular season - when the Penguins lost twice in New Jersey in a six-day span - it was starting to become evident that the Devils had earned a psychological advantage over the Penguins. The teams meet for the first time Oct. 11 in Newark, which will be the Penguins' first road game.
• Many of the Penguins have expressed disappointment with the ice surface at Consol Energy Center, but there aren't any problems with their practice ice. Captain Sidney Crosby called the Iceoplex ice surface "great." Of course, the Southpointe rink doesn't double as a concert site and is kept extremely cold. "Hopefully the new ice will get better," Crosby said.
• Center Ryan Craig remains out with a lower body injury and likely won't play tonight against the Chicago Blackhawks. The rest of the team appears healthy entering tonight's game.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.