Share This Page

Cooke vows to change ways

Penguins general manager Ray Shero made it clear Friday that left wing Matt Cooke will remain with the team next season.

Cooke made it clear he is a new man and will become a new player.

A week away from the team — which Cooke requested when his 17-game suspension for elbowing New York Rangers defenseman Ryan McDonagh was announced — was apparently an eye-opening experience for the NHL's reigning poster child for dirty play.

Although Cooke did not offer specifics regarding his time away from the team, he requested help of some nature.

"It's something I did on my own," said Cooke, who talked publicly for the first time since March 21. "After it happened, I asked Ray and ownership if I could leave for a little while. They were OK with it. Everyone has times in their lives when you need help or you need to talk to somebody. I've had the chance to work with some people. I spent a week specifically dealing with those things."

Cooke, who has two years remaining on his contract, vows that his days of being suspended are over.

"The proof of everything will come," Cooke said. "I can sit here and say I'm going to change. When you see me next year, that's when the proof will come."

Speculation in the aftermath of Cooke's suspension strongly hinted that the Penguins, who have spearheaded a movement to eliminate hits to the head from the NHL, would consider trading him this summer.

Shero squashed such talk.

"There is every indication he will be back with us," Shero said. "He's taken steps after the suspension to improve himself as a person and as a player."

Cooke mentioned that he has spent significant time with coach Dan Bylsma this season, better educating himself about the NHL's precise rules on illegal hits. Even when discussing these conversations with his coach, however, Cooke's thoughts turned to his time away from the Penguins.

"Unfortunately, I made a mistake," Cooke said. "But since then, I worked on some things I needed help with. I've had a chance to deal with some great people outside of hockey, and I will continue to do so."

Had the Penguins not blown a 3-1 series lead against the Lightning, Cooke would have been eligible to play in the second round of the Stanley Cup playoffs.

Cooke said watching the Penguins "battle without me hurt a lot."

The Penguins' penalty killing and inability to generate a consistent forecheck against the Lightning spoke volumes of Cooke's importance. During the postseason Cooke's teammates acknowledged badly missing his presence.

"I appreciate that they see the worth in my value," Cooke said. "My teammates have been amazing. But it's still hard to take a positive out of something that I caused."

The Penguins are banking on a new and improved Cooke next season.

"When we missed (Sidney) Crosby and (Evgeni) Malkin in the playoffs," Shero said, "We also missed Matt Cooke."

Additional Information:

Cooked

A look at how the Penguins fared with and without top penalty killer Matt Cooke in the lineup:

With Cooke: 67 games, 241 killed penalties/271 total penalties (88.9 percent)

Without Cooke: 22 games, 61 killed penalties/82 total penalties (74.3 percent)

Source: ESPN.com

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.