Share This Page

Pens struggling with 5 on 3 power plays

Everyone has a theory about the Penguins' troubles on 5-on-3 power plays. The solution remains a mystery. Defenseman Kris Letang suggests working set plays down low, right wing James Neal believes the Penguins are being too fancy, and coach Dan Bylsma thinks his squad simply needs to relax. The Penguins have received four opportunities with a two-man advantage during their past three games, many of them for extended periods, and have failed to score. Despite receiving 5:17 of 5-on-3 power-play time in this stretch, the Penguins haven't even mustered quality opportunities. Malkin and Letang have had loads of shots blocked during the past week. "Sometimes you try to force things," Neal said. "You get away from the simple things." Bylsma said his team has to practice "emotional control" and suggested that the Penguins begin to rush plays when a power-play advantage reaches the latter stages. "Little things are big things when you're five-on-three," he said. "That's a point in the game when you feel like you should score a goal. The pressure mounts on you to score. The clock is ticking. We haven't been real disciplined in our execution. Maybe (we) felt the pressure."

-- Bylsma announced that Crosby will not play tonight against Florida. The coach said that Crosby's game-participation status will be updated on the day before games to "avoid speculation." Crosby did not speak with the media.

-- Center Dustin Jeffrey will not play for 10-15 days while he continues to strengthen his surgically repaired knee. Bylsma said that Jeffrey has not aggravated the injury.

-- Left wing Steve Sullivan did not practice Friday but is not believed to be injured.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.