Share This Page

Stubborn penalty-killing unit lifts Penguins

The Penguins have been maddeningly inconsistent over the past couple of weeks, but one aspect of their game remains unflappable.

Penalty killing has been a team strength from the day Dan Bylsma became coach, and nothing has changed this season. The Penguins rank second in the NHL with a 90.3 success rate on the penalty kill and have blanked opposing power plays in 18 of their 22 games.

"What's been so impressive to me is how the four guys on the ice always work together," said veteran center Richard Park, a longtime penalty killing specialist who has fit in nicely. "It's very clear that there is a plan in place, and everyone is always on the same page."

The Penguins have been especially impressive at home, killing 28 of 29 penalties for a 96.5 success rate. Washington scored the only power-play goal against the Penguins at Consol Energy Center this season, and that tally came with a 4-on-3 advantage because it took place in overtime.

Also, the Penguins have permitted only two power-play goals all season when goalie Marc-Andre Fleury starts.

Only New Jersey (93.8 percent) ranks higher than the Penguins, who led the league in penalty killing last season.

"The whole unit has been very good," Park said. "And when you've got goaltending like we get, that only makes it better."

Note: The Penguins held a 45-minute Thanksgiving practice. Only defenseman Kris Letang and left wing Chris Kunitz did not participate, but both are expected to play Friday night against the Ottawa Senators.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.