Boudreau agrees with firing by Washington Capitals
Bruce Boudreau thinks the Washington Capitals made the "right decision" in firing him — and he's not blaming his newfound unemployment on Alex Ovechkin.
And, yes, he watched the Capitals' first game without him, a 2-1 loss under new coach Dale Hunter.
"I was nervous," Boudreau said. "You can be fired, but it doesn't mean you don't have feelings for the players, and all of the players there you get to know so well, you want them to do well. I still think they're a great team, and they're going to do well, and Dale's going to do well. He's a good man. You're nervous for them because you want to see them succeed."
Boudreau's approach failed to reinvigorate team captain Ovechkin, who was coming off a career-worst season and was off to a slow start this fall.
"I don't believe Alex was ever a problem," Boudreau said Wednesday. "I think he worked as hard and tried as hard as he could. I think it just didn't go well statistically for him, and when things don't go well statistically people try to put two and two together and they usually end up with five."
• The injury-riddled Buffalo Sabres received a bit of a boost Wednesday when goalie Ryan Miller returned to practice for the first time since suffering a concussion/neck injury. Miller was hurt when Boston's Milan Lucic bowled him over in the first period of a 6-2 loss to the Bruins on Nov. 12, and has missed the past eight games. The Sabres are 3-4-1 without him.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.