Share This Page

Penguins lose right winger Asham to concussion symptoms

Right wing Arron Asham is the sixth Penguins player to be diagnosed with a concussion or concussion symptoms this season. He is out indefinitely after experiencing symptoms during the Penguins' 6-3 victory in Tampa Bay on Sunday.

"(He has) symptoms that are concussion-like, and we are treating it as such," Penguins coach Dan Bylsma said.

Asham was involved in a fight with Florida's Krys Barch during the first period of a game last Friday, although the Penguins have not been able to confirm that a concussion took place at that time.

Asham, who missed seven weeks with a concussion last season, felt nauseous while on the bench during the second period against the Lightning.

Joe Vitale has replaced him in the lineup during the past two games.

> > Thursday's game against the Rangers marked the first time since Oct. 22 that the Penguins' top seven defensemen — Kris Letang, Brooks Orpik, Zbynek Michalek, Paul Martin, Matt Niskanen, Deryk Engelland and Ben Lovejoy — were all healthy.

> > Lovejoy was a healthy scratch with Letang back in the lineup. In his 12 games since returning from a broken wrist, Lovejoy has produced an even plus/minus rating, one goal and one assist.

> > Center Evgeni Malkin was in the lineup Thursday night despite missing several practices recently, including Wednesday's.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.