Penguins say captain Crosby's diagnosis is promising
If Sidney Crosby did sustain a neck injury, maybe this latest diagnosis will be the key to his recovery, Penguins teammates said Monday.
"It's great to know, when something is wrong, to know what's going on," defenseman Kris Letang said. "Now he can really focus on getting back and treat whatever is wrong."
Crosby skated yesterday at Consol Energy Center, two days after the team confirmed that a Los Angeles-based spine specialist diagnosed Crosby as having "suffered a neck injury in addition to a concussion."
The injury was "fully healed," the team said.
"If that is the case, then hopefully it maybe puts some of this stuff behind him," defenseman Brooks Orpik said. "Maybe it was a mental hurdle, just not knowing. It's just good to see him back."
An unnamed independent physician will review Dr. Robert S. Bray's findings, but those results are not yet available, coach Dan Bylsma said. Bylsma was hopeful for a definitive diagnosis, and said the uncertainty surrounding Crosby's injury has been difficult for everybody.
"I think all along you'd like to have a definitive answer about what Sidney has, so that you know the road (to recovery)," Bylsma said. "I think that's the most difficult thing about it, starting last year with a concussion and going forward: You don't have a definite answer."
The team returned from the all-star break Monday with an afternoon practice but Crosby did not participate, having skated earlier with injured teammates Jordan Staal and Simon Despres.
Crosby hasn't played since Dec. 5.
"If there was some type of exact road he could go down, that would be a positive thing for Sidney and getting him back to full health," Bylsma said. "I don't know if that's the case, but it would be a good thing."
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.